Best Known (172−64, 172, s)-Nets in Base 8
(172−64, 172, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (108, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
(172−64, 172, 576)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(108, 172, 576)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (22, 86, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (22, 91, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 78, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 78, 288)-net over F128, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (22, 91, 288)-net in base 64, using
(172−64, 172, 1024)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (108, 172, 1024)-net over F8, using
(172−64, 172, 130564)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (108, 172, 130565)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 214564 773687 092927 535392 590482 007138 257788 374855 420443 411115 119706 595922 609644 438234 635754 647737 288153 912501 670998 611999 595943 693611 650497 122240 754748 757904 > 8172 [i]