Best Known (65, 65+66, s)-Nets in Base 8
(65, 65+66, 130)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (65, 131, 130)-net over F8, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (65, 139, 130)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (14, 51, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (14, 88, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8 (see above)
- digital (14, 51, 65)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(65, 65+66, 211)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (65, 131, 211)-net over F8, using
(65, 65+66, 7211)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (65, 131, 7212)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 20251 483979 055890 574883 234759 767919 900445 110889 199446 538838 608078 240839 745510 558557 395938 132976 764477 528968 388057 745793 > 8131 [i]