Best Known (126−67, 126, s)-Nets in Base 8
(126−67, 126, 113)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (59, 126, 113)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (59, 127, 113)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 45, 48)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 47)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 47)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (14, 82, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (11, 45, 48)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(126−67, 126, 164)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (59, 126, 164)-net over F8, using
(126−67, 126, 4934)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (59, 126, 4935)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (59, 125, 4935)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 77264 425823 958402 887963 853312 862437 967386 532777 551179 493601 056443 348267 630816 901456 937562 174672 613282 154470 237340 > 8125 [i]