Best Known (85, 85+67, s)-Nets in Base 8
(85, 85+67, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (85, 152, 354)-net over F8, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (85, 156, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 78, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 78, 177)-net over F64, using
(85, 85+67, 418)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (85, 152, 418)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 76, 209)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 208)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 209, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 208)-sequence over F64, using
(85, 85+67, 25481)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (85, 152, 25482)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (85, 151, 25482)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 23275 451493 747446 936060 024177 778574 338917 618620 380749 755479 266068 329371 518314 557488 882080 607024 952167 084190 957621 344579 101993 300656 083500 > 8151 [i]