Best Known (96, 96+67, s)-Nets in Base 8
(96, 96+67, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 163, 354)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (93, 163, 354)-net over F8, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
(96, 96+67, 604)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (96, 163, 604)-net over F8, using
(96, 96+67, 50983)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 163, 50984)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (96, 162, 50984)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 199 843229 630309 552430 160959 181744 666263 266899 668794 814198 070379 711062 879010 194820 340632 117284 137964 536217 437825 022621 437941 098461 133041 186913 206345 > 8162 [i]