Best Known (160−68, 160, s)-Nets in Base 8
(160−68, 160, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (92, 160, 354)-net over F8, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (92, 170, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 85, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 85, 177)-net over F64, using
(160−68, 160, 514)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (92, 160, 514)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (12, 80, 257)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (12, 256)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 12 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (12, 256)-sequence over F64, using
(160−68, 160, 34351)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (92, 160, 34352)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3 124016 551386 097522 208938 787432 016716 287187 962055 481416 807329 407405 936925 105664 148477 714450 870622 725489 658518 893434 713860 501905 173546 152926 227981 > 8160 [i]