Best Known (162−69, 162, s)-Nets in Base 8
(162−69, 162, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (93, 162, 354)-net over F8, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
(162−69, 162, 514)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (93, 162, 514)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (12, 81, 257)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (12, 256)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 12 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (12, 256)-sequence over F64, using
(162−69, 162, 36519)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (93, 162, 36520)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (93, 161, 36520)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 24 994594 363158 374093 063647 225939 490209 177980 262381 344082 499374 753345 931557 528716 684504 761520 453382 291390 577868 539004 231559 340533 242250 599175 910297 > 8161 [i]