Best Known (65, 65+69, s)-Nets in Base 8
(65, 65+69, 130)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (65, 134, 130)-net over F8, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (65, 139, 130)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (14, 51, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (14, 88, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8 (see above)
- digital (14, 51, 65)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(65, 65+69, 197)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (65, 134, 197)-net over F8, using
(65, 65+69, 6571)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (65, 134, 6572)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (65, 133, 6572)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 1 296420 209703 115988 856164 676074 961293 595418 373784 118796 781730 016886 136991 741124 414076 867973 752776 584100 703322 508219 462039 > 8133 [i]