Best Known (78, 78+69, s)-Nets in Base 8
(78, 78+69, 208)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (78, 147, 208)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (78, 150, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 75, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 75, 104)-net over F64, using
(78, 78+69, 225)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(78, 147, 225)-net in base 8, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (78, 152, 225)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 114, 225)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 114, 225)-net over F16, using
(78, 78+69, 312)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (78, 147, 312)-net over F8, using
(78, 78+69, 14578)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (78, 147, 14579)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (78, 146, 14579)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 710423 600674 405549 850001 598411 426436 721006 980712 854200 650348 757261 891013 974235 686409 245874 405287 785883 196248 960870 877726 229107 336661 > 8146 [i]