Best Known (139−75, 139, s)-Nets in Base 8
(139−75, 139, 113)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (64, 139, 113)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (64, 142, 113)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 50, 48)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 47)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 47)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (14, 92, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (11, 50, 48)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(139−75, 139, 169)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (64, 139, 169)-net over F8, using
(139−75, 139, 4864)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (64, 139, 4865)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (64, 138, 4865)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 42518 008100 443347 648378 623573 586350 065616 328031 163166 524759 393462 031838 599709 746590 053157 856232 306686 427897 526315 933914 651392 > 8138 [i]