Best Known (160−76, 160, s)-Nets in Base 8
(160−76, 160, 208)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (84, 160, 208)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (84, 162, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 81, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 81, 104)-net over F64, using
(160−76, 160, 225)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(84, 160, 225)-net in base 8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (83, 160, 225)-net in base 8, using
- 12 times m-reduction [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- 12 times m-reduction [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
(160−76, 160, 319)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (84, 160, 319)-net over F8, using
(160−76, 160, 13596)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (84, 160, 13597)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3 126401 086480 163497 747260 036566 097737 134313 566251 119196 617266 502841 891196 742455 142368 933150 068677 150622 160675 362307 812566 226118 156201 545739 290144 > 8160 [i]