Best Known (85, 85+76, s)-Nets in Base 8
(85, 85+76, 208)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (85, 161, 208)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (85, 164, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 82, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 82, 104)-net over F64, using
(85, 85+76, 225)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(85, 161, 225)-net in base 8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (83, 161, 225)-net in base 8, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
(85, 85+76, 329)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (85, 161, 329)-net over F8, using
(85, 85+76, 14362)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (85, 161, 14363)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 25 002212 217605 995372 133249 193122 675625 206265 615980 963927 850656 599180 023671 862802 016151 100494 753773 124653 302945 869251 957770 357982 428564 066036 680832 > 8161 [i]