Best Known (145−79, 145, s)-Nets in Base 8
(145−79, 145, 113)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (66, 145, 113)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (66, 148, 113)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 52, 48)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 47)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 47)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (14, 96, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (11, 52, 48)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(145−79, 145, 168)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (66, 145, 168)-net over F8, using
(145−79, 145, 4726)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (66, 145, 4727)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (66, 144, 4727)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 11111 015155 102789 394419 586772 141488 587746 115725 996151 145631 183565 866282 899716 563764 487464 439040 136730 080203 499014 711436 285652 193128 > 8144 [i]