Best Known (162−79, 162, s)-Nets in Base 8
(162−79, 162, 160)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (83, 162, 160)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (83, 164, 160)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 82, 80)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 82, 80)-net over F64, using
(162−79, 162, 225)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(83, 162, 225)-net in base 8, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
(162−79, 162, 289)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (83, 162, 289)-net over F8, using
(162−79, 162, 11737)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (83, 162, 11738)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (83, 161, 11738)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 25 049820 323298 250815 254488 311410 471670 049942 384345 393575 190320 368187 777286 453664 520302 107902 269144 492823 006481 149455 637976 754496 896170 239788 034488 > 8161 [i]