Best Known (164−80, 164, s)-Nets in Base 8
(164−80, 164, 160)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (84, 164, 160)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (84, 166, 160)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 83, 80)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 83, 80)-net over F64, using
(164−80, 164, 225)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(84, 164, 225)-net in base 8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (83, 164, 225)-net in base 8, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
(164−80, 164, 291)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (84, 164, 291)-net over F8, using
(164−80, 164, 11334)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (84, 164, 11335)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 12814 786810 816215 183456 373926 065657 232640 640423 963779 643183 087564 151443 117778 069397 831868 910347 064861 158009 886375 094597 686424 923921 918481 101631 756344 > 8164 [i]