Best Known (165−82, 165, s)-Nets in Base 8
(165−82, 165, 130)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (83, 165, 130)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (83, 166, 130)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 83, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the rational function field F64(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 83, 65)-net over F64, using
(165−82, 165, 225)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(83, 165, 225)-net in base 8, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
(165−82, 165, 271)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (83, 165, 271)-net over F8, using
(165−82, 165, 9909)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (83, 165, 9910)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 102322 906214 624677 531853 491837 383846 627886 217035 151452 888519 185148 671815 122748 824633 329095 489370 109579 868615 463931 417184 609164 374012 347003 411274 893610 > 8165 [i]