Best Known (86, 86+83, s)-Nets in Base 8
(86, 86+83, 194)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (86, 169, 194)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (85, 169, 194)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (85, 193)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 85 and N(F) ≥ 194, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (85, 193)-sequence over F8, using
(86, 86+83, 225)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(86, 169, 225)-net in base 8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (83, 169, 225)-net in base 8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
(86, 86+83, 291)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (86, 169, 291)-net over F8, using
(86, 86+83, 11542)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (86, 169, 11543)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (86, 168, 11543)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 52 417029 496284 528022 953225 719359 477938 734077 957218 904942 378000 620897 191508 677561 501139 802366 879352 988306 754459 001035 960906 611874 675698 238430 424334 585440 > 8168 [i]