MinT - Best Known (64, 64+88, s)-Nets in Base 8

Best Known (64, 64+88, s)-Nets in Base 8

(64, 64+88, 98)-Net over F₈ — Constructive and digital

Digital (64, 152, 98)-net over F₈, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (37, 152, 98)-net over F₈, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 97)-sequence over F₈, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₈ with g(F) = 37 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
    - F₅ from the tower of function fields over F₈ by van der Geer and van der Vlugt [i]

(64, 64+88, 144)-Net over F₈ — Digital

Digital (64, 152, 144)-net over F₈, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (45, 152, 144)-net over F₈, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 143)-sequence over F₈, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₈ with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 144, using
    - Drinfeld modules of rank 1 [i]

(64, 64+88, 150)-Net in Base 8

(64, 152, 150)-net in base 8, using

base change [i] based on digital (26, 114, 150)-net over F₁₆, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 149)-sequence over F₁₆, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 150, using
    - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(64, 64+88, 3220)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s

There is no (64, 152, 3221)-net in base 8, because

the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8^mÂ â‰¥ 188372 402796 428704 168862 732412 108597 725786 174776 424966 410336 434108 730445 775003 273715 870167 098241 947056 978731 490064 465124 567756 891203 742904 > 8¹⁵² [i]