Best Known (82, 82+91, s)-Nets in Base 8
(82, 82+91, 130)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (82, 173, 130)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (76, 173, 130)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (14, 62, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (14, 111, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8 (see above)
- digital (14, 62, 65)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(82, 82+91, 225)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (82, 173, 225)-net over F8, using
(82, 82+91, 7098)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (82, 173, 7099)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (82, 172, 7099)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 215518 615557 057274 876750 920499 024838 704314 791208 793096 604891 415163 158033 874898 662258 078227 643341 075509 441519 774083 717133 932261 933022 251622 009324 959612 544664 > 8172 [i]