Best Known (39, 39+95, s)-Nets in Base 8
(39, 39+95, 98)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (39, 134, 98)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (37, 134, 98)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 97)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 37 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 97)-sequence over F8, using
(39, 39+95, 129)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (39, 134, 129)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (38, 134, 129)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (38, 128)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 38 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (38, 128)-sequence over F8, using
(39, 39+95, 913)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (39, 134, 914)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (39, 133, 914)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 1 313316 278674 198663 662329 763739 652260 474129 178886 861296 691654 893911 111804 487470 583903 430438 353293 006803 621930 450882 314080 > 8133 [i]