Best Known (65, 65+95, s)-Nets in Base 8
(65, 65+95, 98)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (65, 160, 98)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (37, 160, 98)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 97)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 37 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 97)-sequence over F8, using
(65, 65+95, 144)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (65, 160, 144)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (45, 160, 144)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 143)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 144, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 143)-sequence over F8, using
(65, 65+95, 2949)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (65, 160, 2950)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (65, 159, 2950)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 391320 808145 378660 665612 706558 052236 131474 906550 476095 834051 964266 860949 002862 696661 894250 094752 931252 576943 497835 088824 881719 823490 491292 736832 > 8159 [i]