Best Known (68, 68+95, s)-Nets in Base 8
(68, 68+95, 99)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (68, 163, 99)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (7, 54, 34)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 33)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 33)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (14, 109, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (7, 54, 34)-net over F8, using
(68, 68+95, 144)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (68, 163, 144)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (45, 163, 144)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 143)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 144, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 143)-sequence over F8, using
(68, 68+95, 156)-Net in Base 8
(68, 163, 156)-net in base 8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (68, 164, 156)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (27, 123, 156)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 155)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 27 and N(F) ≥ 156, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 155)-sequence over F16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (27, 123, 156)-net over F16, using
(68, 68+95, 3372)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (68, 163, 3373)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (68, 162, 3373)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 200 570245 403889 214342 833439 073312 486125 845410 775284 589957 877050 954788 015681 354538 787676 371437 286884 131354 352056 627821 193010 684939 676021 448460 087552 > 8162 [i]