Best Known (63, 63+99, s)-Nets in Base 8
(63, 63+99, 98)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (63, 162, 98)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (37, 162, 98)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 97)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 37 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 97)-sequence over F8, using
(63, 63+99, 144)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (63, 162, 144)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (45, 162, 144)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 143)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 144, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 143)-sequence over F8, using
(63, 63+99, 2501)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (63, 162, 2502)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (63, 161, 2502)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 25 284819 126600 950723 155209 413557 059753 330567 116176 507091 151542 290352 934288 125774 704027 114716 883241 584781 851629 997298 332232 882487 114129 147752 347916 > 8161 [i]