Best Known (61, 100, s)-Nets in Base 8
(61, 100, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (61, 100, 354)-net over F8, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (61, 108, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 54, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 54, 177)-net over F64, using
(61, 100, 384)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(61, 100, 384)-net in base 8, using
- 82 times duplication [i] based on (59, 98, 384)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (10, 49, 192)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 42, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 42, 192)-net over F128, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (10, 49, 192)-net in base 64, using
(61, 100, 526)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (61, 100, 526)-net over F8, using
(61, 100, 57491)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (61, 100, 57492)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (61, 99, 57492)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 254677 211552 318159 834745 258593 928656 202444 453185 810152 056677 246687 331247 901376 959296 059655 > 899 [i]