Best Known (65, 100, s)-Nets in Base 8
(65, 100, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (65, 100, 354)-net over F8, using
- 16 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (65, 116, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 58, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 58, 177)-net over F64, using
(65, 100, 518)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(65, 100, 518)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 75, 518)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (40, 76, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 38, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 38, 259)-net over F256, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (40, 76, 518)-net over F16, using
(65, 100, 893)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (65, 100, 893)-net over F8, using
(65, 100, 186206)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (65, 100, 186207)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (65, 99, 186207)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 254650 004262 709508 585053 403446 677866 883701 986976 262877 484622 265303 014351 470965 228361 673126 > 899 [i]