Best Known (73, 102, s)-Nets in Base 8
(73, 102, 514)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (73, 102, 514)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (16, 30, 160)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 15, 80)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 15, 80)-net over F64, using
- digital (43, 72, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 36, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 36, 177)-net over F64, using
- digital (16, 30, 160)-net over F8, using
(73, 102, 576)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(73, 102, 576)-net in base 8, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on (73, 112, 576)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (17, 56, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 48, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 48, 288)-net over F128, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (17, 56, 288)-net in base 64, using
(73, 102, 3712)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (73, 102, 3712)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(8102, 3712, F8, 29) (dual of [3712, 3610, 30]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8102, 4105, F8, 29) (dual of [4105, 4003, 30]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(28) ⊂ Ce(26) [i] based on
- linear OA(8101, 4096, F8, 29) (dual of [4096, 3995, 30]-code), using an extension Ce(28) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 84−1, defining interval I = [1,28], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 29 [i]
- linear OA(893, 4096, F8, 27) (dual of [4096, 4003, 28]-code), using an extension Ce(26) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 84−1, defining interval I = [1,26], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 27 [i]
- linear OA(81, 9, F8, 1) (dual of [9, 8, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(81, s, F8, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(28) ⊂ Ce(26) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8102, 4105, F8, 29) (dual of [4105, 4003, 30]-code), using
(73, 102, 2828183)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (73, 102, 2828184)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (73, 101, 2828184)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 16 296327 185438 342120 438947 501825 673614 364822 355928 079336 671288 883371 621231 246194 295561 122678 > 8101 [i]