Best Known (58, 104, s)-Nets in Base 8
(58, 104, 256)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (58, 104, 256)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (58, 106, 256)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 53, 128)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 53, 128)-net over F64, using
(58, 104, 322)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (58, 104, 322)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 52, 161)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 160)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 161, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 160)-sequence over F64, using
(58, 104, 16312)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (58, 104, 16313)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 8351 797406 055930 460328 730436 904587 596230 791801 627347 499588 539227 807973 627827 059333 387926 067224 > 8104 [i]