Best Known (68, 105, s)-Nets in Base 8
(68, 105, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (68, 105, 354)-net over F8, using
- 17 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (68, 122, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 61, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 61, 177)-net over F64, using
(68, 105, 518)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(68, 105, 518)-net in base 8, using
- 81 times duplication [i] based on (67, 104, 518)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (41, 78, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 39, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 39, 259)-net over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (41, 78, 518)-net over F16, using
(68, 105, 896)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (68, 105, 896)-net over F8, using
(68, 105, 178179)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (68, 105, 178180)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (68, 104, 178180)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 8343 928916 689973 534263 205211 687470 201480 373162 599830 496708 164170 454415 493317 947272 623964 356992 > 8104 [i]