Best Known (29, 106, s)-Nets in Base 8
(29, 106, 65)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 106, 65)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (14, 106, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
(29, 106, 97)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (29, 106, 97)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (28, 106, 97)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 96)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 97, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 96)-sequence over F8, using
(29, 106, 647)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 106, 648)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 105, 648)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 67170 697261 228086 709008 989051 448737 004129 302240 788126 731525 805380 717103 824865 389806 377539 215668 > 8105 [i]