Best Known (61, 109, s)-Nets in Base 8
(61, 109, 256)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (61, 109, 256)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (61, 112, 256)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 56, 128)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 56, 128)-net over F64, using
(61, 109, 322)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (61, 109, 322)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (61, 110, 322)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 55, 161)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 160)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 161, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 160)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 55, 161)-net over F64, using
(61, 109, 17677)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (61, 109, 17678)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 273 425096 447525 475591 834260 904409 616676 082902 903951 313518 958199 307458 980365 651203 678442 383901 096304 > 8109 [i]