Best Known (59, 110, s)-Nets in Base 8
(59, 110, 208)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (59, 110, 208)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (59, 112, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 56, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 56, 104)-net over F64, using
(59, 110, 258)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (59, 110, 258)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 55, 129)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 128)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 128)-sequence over F64, using
(59, 110, 12573)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (59, 110, 12574)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (59, 109, 12574)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 273 573384 270343 522642 739318 594948 097460 980218 227647 657319 144889 252845 667791 663853 534451 150522 926297 > 8109 [i]