Best Known (66, 112, s)-Nets in Base 8
(66, 112, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (66, 112, 354)-net over F8, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (66, 118, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 59, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 59, 177)-net over F64, using
(66, 112, 450)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (66, 112, 450)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 56, 225)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 224)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 224)-sequence over F64, using
(66, 112, 33637)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (66, 112, 33638)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 139989 346491 283892 745821 933270 534484 210881 720939 168410 601677 346242 364002 532631 924344 585199 449109 839184 > 8112 [i]