Best Known (76, 119, s)-Nets in Base 8
(76, 119, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (76, 119, 354)-net over F8, using
- 19 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (76, 138, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 69, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 69, 177)-net over F64, using
(76, 119, 516)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(76, 119, 516)-net in base 8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (76, 120, 516)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (46, 90, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 45, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 45, 258)-net over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (46, 90, 516)-net over F16, using
(76, 119, 875)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (76, 119, 875)-net over F8, using
(76, 119, 147184)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (76, 119, 147185)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (76, 118, 147185)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 36699 065044 265736 140137 363729 700210 315849 727915 705935 120921 604389 504380 671778 274366 677893 793399 872437 173792 > 8118 [i]