Best Known (96, 119, s)-Nets in Base 8
(96, 119, 3013)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 119, 3013)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (7, 18, 34)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 33)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 33)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (78, 101, 2979)-net over F8, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(8101, 2979, F8, 23, 23) (dual of [(2979, 23), 68416, 24]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 11-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(8101, 32770, F8, 23) (dual of [32770, 32669, 24]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8101, 32773, F8, 23) (dual of [32773, 32672, 24]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(22) ⊂ Ce(21) [i] based on
- linear OA(8101, 32768, F8, 23) (dual of [32768, 32667, 24]-code), using an extension Ce(22) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 32767 = 85−1, defining interval I = [1,22], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 23 [i]
- linear OA(896, 32768, F8, 22) (dual of [32768, 32672, 23]-code), using an extension Ce(21) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 32767 = 85−1, defining interval I = [1,21], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 22 [i]
- linear OA(80, 5, F8, 0) (dual of [5, 5, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(80, s, F8, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(22) ⊂ Ce(21) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8101, 32773, F8, 23) (dual of [32773, 32672, 24]-code), using
- OOA 11-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(8101, 32770, F8, 23) (dual of [32770, 32669, 24]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(8101, 2979, F8, 23, 23) (dual of [(2979, 23), 68416, 24]-NRT-code), using
- digital (7, 18, 34)-net over F8, using
(96, 119, 5959)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(96, 119, 5959)-net in base 8, using
- 83 times duplication [i] based on (93, 116, 5959)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (64, 87, 5959)-net over F16, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(1687, 5959, F16, 23, 23) (dual of [(5959, 23), 136970, 24]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 11-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(1687, 65550, F16, 23) (dual of [65550, 65463, 24]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(22) ⊂ Ce(19) [i] based on
- linear OA(1685, 65536, F16, 23) (dual of [65536, 65451, 24]-code), using an extension Ce(22) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65535 = 164−1, defining interval I = [1,22], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 23 [i]
- linear OA(1673, 65536, F16, 20) (dual of [65536, 65463, 21]-code), using an extension Ce(19) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65535 = 164−1, defining interval I = [1,19], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 20 [i]
- linear OA(162, 14, F16, 2) (dual of [14, 12, 3]-code or 14-arc in PG(1,16)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(162, 16, F16, 2) (dual of [16, 14, 3]-code or 16-arc in PG(1,16)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(14,16) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(162, 16, F16, 2) (dual of [16, 14, 3]-code or 16-arc in PG(1,16)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(22) ⊂ Ce(19) [i] based on
- OOA 11-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(1687, 65550, F16, 23) (dual of [65550, 65463, 24]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(1687, 5959, F16, 23, 23) (dual of [(5959, 23), 136970, 24]-NRT-code), using
- base change [i] based on digital (64, 87, 5959)-net over F16, using
(96, 119, 99243)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (96, 119, 99243)-net over F8, using
(96, 119, large)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 119, large)-net in base 8, because
- 21 times m-reduction [i] would yield (96, 98, large)-net in base 8, but