Best Known (77, 128, s)-Nets in Base 8
(77, 128, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (77, 128, 354)-net over F8, using
- 12 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (77, 140, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 70, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 70, 177)-net over F64, using
(77, 128, 384)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(77, 128, 384)-net in base 8, using
- 82 times duplication [i] based on (75, 126, 384)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (12, 63, 192)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 54, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 54, 192)-net over F128, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (12, 63, 192)-net in base 64, using
(77, 128, 572)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (77, 128, 572)-net over F8, using
(77, 128, 56247)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (77, 128, 56248)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (77, 127, 56248)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 4 925921 334778 209476 351811 173182 834652 744876 779991 634815 370389 585958 059187 426091 363954 647288 963048 105909 705669 189476 > 8127 [i]