Best Known (92, 129, s)-Nets in Base 8
(92, 129, 514)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (92, 129, 514)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (92, 130, 514)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 40, 160)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 20, 80)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 20, 80)-net over F64, using
- digital (52, 90, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 45, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 45, 177)-net over F64, using
- digital (21, 40, 160)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(92, 129, 600)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(92, 129, 600)-net in base 8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 21, 24)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 23)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- the Klein quartic over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 23)-sequence over F8, using
- (71, 108, 576)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (17, 54, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (17, 56, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 48, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 48, 288)-net over F128, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (17, 56, 288)-net in base 64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (17, 54, 288)-net in base 64, using
- digital (3, 21, 24)-net over F8, using
(92, 129, 3968)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (92, 129, 3968)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(8129, 3968, F8, 37) (dual of [3968, 3839, 38]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8129, 4096, F8, 37) (dual of [4096, 3967, 38]-code), using
- an extension Ce(36) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 84−1, defining interval I = [1,36], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 37 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8129, 4096, F8, 37) (dual of [4096, 3967, 38]-code), using
(92, 129, 2851041)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (92, 129, 2851042)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (92, 128, 2851042)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 39 402078 272492 058288 080742 364385 046169 651970 141835 730512 253895 463569 450983 352717 950793 121630 456162 425201 590574 852080 > 8128 [i]