Best Known (80, 130, s)-Nets in Base 8
(80, 130, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (80, 130, 354)-net over F8, using
- 16 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (80, 146, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 73, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 73, 177)-net over F64, using
(80, 130, 432)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(80, 130, 432)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (15, 65, 216)-net in base 64, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (15, 70, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 60, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 60, 216)-net over F128, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (15, 70, 216)-net in base 64, using
(80, 130, 690)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (80, 130, 690)-net over F8, using
(80, 130, 72194)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (80, 130, 72195)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 2522 462443 850053 374967 107282 952001 138566 416602 590902 042756 248368 131349 208889 529753 139638 917024 731837 482372 691276 285312 > 8130 [i]