Best Known (96, 131, s)-Nets in Base 8
(96, 131, 1026)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 131, 1026)-net over F8, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (96, 136, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 68, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 68, 513)-net over F64, using
(96, 131, 5850)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (96, 131, 5850)-net over F8, using
(96, 131, 8257125)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 131, 8257126)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (96, 130, 8257126)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 2521 732350 897022 130964 319428 633218 870826 746033 440662 022035 008610 652586 062079 547404 510796 109239 419761 195315 080165 142398 > 8130 [i]