Best Known (96, 132, s)-Nets in Base 8
(96, 132, 1026)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 132, 1026)-net over F8, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (96, 136, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 68, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 68, 513)-net over F64, using
(96, 132, 5077)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (96, 132, 5077)-net over F8, using
(96, 132, 4525753)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 132, 4525754)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 161391 186458 771300 117964 732311 623831 970758 722800 224586 976343 856395 144101 794087 780969 356517 426272 076122 943946 673222 011140 > 8132 [i]