Best Known (60, 133, s)-Nets in Base 8
(60, 133, 111)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (60, 133, 111)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (10, 46, 46)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 45)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F8 with g(F) = 9, N(F) = 45, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 45, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 45)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (14, 87, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (10, 46, 46)-net over F8, using
(60, 133, 152)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (60, 133, 152)-net over F8, using
(60, 133, 4155)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (60, 133, 4156)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (60, 132, 4156)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 162227 078515 276985 909073 241390 305348 409070 156133 143814 327282 060524 662456 961504 455551 574257 095196 958866 253789 310881 581770 > 8132 [i]