Best Known (85, 134, s)-Nets in Base 8
(85, 134, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (85, 134, 354)-net over F8, using
- 22 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (85, 156, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 78, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 78, 177)-net over F64, using
(85, 134, 516)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(85, 134, 516)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (18, 67, 258)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (18, 68, 258)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 51, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 51, 258)-net over F256, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (18, 68, 258)-net in base 64, using
(85, 134, 913)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (85, 134, 913)-net over F8, using
(85, 134, 141528)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (85, 134, 141529)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (85, 133, 141529)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 1 291329 708093 495164 354895 405777 300237 784136 710860 124414 140145 270464 429482 220440 474239 558169 854183 081159 219109 047269 097373 > 8133 [i]