Best Known (85, 135, s)-Nets in Base 8
(85, 135, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (85, 135, 354)-net over F8, using
- 21 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (85, 156, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 78, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 78, 177)-net over F64, using
(85, 135, 514)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(85, 135, 514)-net in base 8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (85, 136, 514)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (51, 102, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 51, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 51, 257)-net over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (51, 102, 514)-net over F16, using
(85, 135, 862)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (85, 135, 862)-net over F8, using
(85, 135, 109433)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (85, 135, 109434)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 82 633640 630767 505317 934032 656203 923721 423824 380473 680167 677384 537586 068017 313401 812079 507751 423477 813834 744889 073663 082737 > 8135 [i]