Best Known (65, 136, s)-Nets in Base 8
(65, 136, 130)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (65, 136, 130)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (65, 139, 130)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (14, 51, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (14, 88, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8 (see above)
- digital (14, 51, 65)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(65, 136, 188)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (65, 136, 188)-net over F8, using
(65, 136, 6024)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (65, 136, 6025)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (65, 135, 6025)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 82 801111 221896 239757 892121 410419 959982 104279 112007 748658 065613 139753 316522 463462 095760 906326 568316 006167 253475 050616 122528 > 8135 [i]