Best Known (86, 136, s)-Nets in Base 8
(86, 136, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (86, 136, 354)-net over F8, using
- 22 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (86, 158, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 79, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 79, 177)-net over F64, using
(86, 136, 516)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(86, 136, 516)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (52, 102, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 51, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 51, 258)-net over F256, using
(86, 136, 901)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (86, 136, 901)-net over F8, using
(86, 136, 118926)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (86, 136, 118927)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 661 056145 112347 054711 633082 860797 303587 496350 213074 615269 277872 568439 043841 271819 955611 328962 497293 013466 312122 270580 874992 > 8136 [i]