Best Known (91, 136, s)-Nets in Base 8
(91, 136, 400)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (91, 136, 400)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (10, 32, 46)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 45)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F8 with g(F) = 9, N(F) = 45, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 45, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 45)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (59, 104, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 52, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 52, 177)-net over F64, using
- digital (10, 32, 46)-net over F8, using
(91, 136, 576)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(91, 136, 576)-net in base 8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (89, 136, 576)-net in base 8, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (89, 140, 576)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (19, 70, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 60, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 60, 288)-net over F128, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (19, 70, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (89, 140, 576)-net in base 8, using
(91, 136, 1547)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (91, 136, 1547)-net over F8, using
(91, 136, 450225)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (91, 136, 450226)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (91, 135, 450226)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 82 632781 708798 153231 559579 871439 800297 976584 588895 490214 283665 826527 031341 716009 607485 632724 021271 617222 548355 648562 976144 > 8135 [i]