Best Known (85, 138, s)-Nets in Base 8
(85, 138, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (85, 138, 354)-net over F8, using
- 18 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (85, 156, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 78, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 78, 177)-net over F64, using
(85, 138, 432)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(85, 138, 432)-net in base 8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (85, 140, 432)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (15, 70, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 60, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 60, 216)-net over F128, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (15, 70, 216)-net in base 64, using
(85, 138, 729)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (85, 138, 729)-net over F8, using
(85, 138, 86437)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (85, 138, 86438)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (85, 137, 86438)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 5288 959772 283039 068057 045251 652927 732982 681466 488990 966886 371047 360824 523893 452960 757261 186494 669476 146410 764768 638637 236024 > 8137 [i]