Best Known (85, 139, s)-Nets in Base 8
(85, 139, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (85, 139, 354)-net over F8, using
- 17 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (85, 156, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 78, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 78, 177)-net over F64, using
(85, 139, 432)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(85, 139, 432)-net in base 8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (85, 140, 432)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (15, 70, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 60, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 60, 216)-net over F128, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (15, 70, 216)-net in base 64, using
(85, 139, 692)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (85, 139, 692)-net over F8, using
(85, 139, 69573)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (85, 139, 69574)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 338511 237712 600601 178322 758929 603701 051971 494059 096300 169759 158397 977038 382858 491117 848854 006168 341545 170540 545959 113717 733584 > 8139 [i]