Best Known (90, 142, s)-Nets in Base 8
(90, 142, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (90, 142, 354)-net over F8, using
- 24 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (90, 166, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 83, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 83, 177)-net over F64, using
(90, 142, 516)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(90, 142, 516)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (19, 71, 258)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (19, 72, 258)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 54, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 54, 258)-net over F256, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (19, 72, 258)-net in base 64, using
(90, 142, 952)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (90, 142, 952)-net over F8, using
(90, 142, 128943)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (90, 142, 128944)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 173 292336 415094 677564 423521 892945 792076 284247 297487 561963 157844 894359 471402 199176 949716 013670 859065 457094 359130 477052 320099 089318 > 8142 [i]