Best Known (104, 143, s)-Nets in Base 8
(104, 143, 1026)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (104, 143, 1026)-net over F8, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (104, 152, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 76, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 76, 513)-net over F64, using
(104, 143, 5391)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (104, 143, 5391)-net over F8, using
(104, 143, 6361009)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (104, 143, 6361010)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (104, 142, 6361010)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 173 292123 318051 305259 826842 748316 813538 097052 128743 931980 318577 807908 104074 745498 161258 173147 276246 225577 697687 905821 412422 998736 > 8142 [i]