Best Known (89, 143, s)-Nets in Base 8
(89, 143, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (89, 143, 354)-net over F8, using
- 21 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (89, 164, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 82, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 82, 177)-net over F64, using
(89, 143, 432)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(89, 143, 432)-net in base 8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (89, 146, 432)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (16, 73, 216)-net in base 64, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 77, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 77, 216)-net in base 64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (16, 73, 216)-net in base 64, using
(89, 143, 817)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (89, 143, 817)-net over F8, using
(89, 143, 94681)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (89, 143, 94682)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 1386 666731 207947 004248 759213 664352 803171 164930 390886 145666 385054 901348 854839 279811 173707 704440 064772 371082 481815 082532 622993 032672 > 8143 [i]